<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newsflash:  Stating the Obvious (Maybe I shouldn&#8217;t read MarketWatch)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kaiyen.com/blog/2009/01/07/newsflash-stating-the-obvious-maybe-i-shouldnt-read-marketwatch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kaiyen.com/blog/2009/01/07/newsflash-stating-the-obvious-maybe-i-shouldnt-read-marketwatch/</link>
	<description>Why have 10 blogs on specific topics when you can have just 1 with all kinds of random topics?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog of kaiyen &#187; re:</title>
		<link>http://kaiyen.com/blog/2009/01/07/newsflash-stating-the-obvious-maybe-i-shouldnt-read-marketwatch/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>blog of kaiyen &#187; re:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaiyen.com/blog/2009/01/07/newsflash-stating-the-obvious-maybe-i-shouldnt-read-marketwatch/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>[...] Schinker posted a comment in response to another post of mine that has me wanting to write a bit more&#8230; I always take what the “experts” say with a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Schinker posted a comment in response to another post of mine that has me wanting to write a bit more&#8230; I always take what the “experts” say with a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://kaiyen.com/blog/2009/01/07/newsflash-stating-the-obvious-maybe-i-shouldnt-read-marketwatch/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaiyen.com/blog/2009/01/07/newsflash-stating-the-obvious-maybe-i-shouldnt-read-marketwatch/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I always take what the &quot;experts&quot; say with a grain of salt.  Expert analysis lags real life - they wait for the numbers to &quot;confirm&quot; what the rest of the world - literally - already knew: we are in a bad recession.  You and I and everyone else on the street knew this at least 6 months ago.  The prices were going up, people were losing jobs, and belt tightening was necessary for nearly everyone.  But the &quot;experts&quot; refused to use the word recession.

But the flip side will also be true.  The recovery will be happening while &quot;they&quot; still think we are in a recession.  So is it a good time to buy a house?  If you can get a mortgage approved, yes!  Mortgage companies are looking for solid loans to boost their bottom lines, so SOME people are in higher demand for loans.  If you aren&#039;t staying in a house for 5 to 7 years, you don&#039;t need a house - that&#039;s been a long-standing rule of thumb, nothing new.  If you lose your job or think you will - and you don&#039;t already have a house - don&#039;t buy one!  Again, not rocket science here.

Actually, most of this recession was caused by people accepting the &quot;too good to be true&quot; lines they were fed at face value.  I actually blogged about this back in September of 2007.  (http://12amusings.wordpress.com/2007/09/01/sub-prime-surprise/)  What?  I can get a home with no money down and only a few hundred dollars a month (interest only loan)?  Wow!  Sounds too good to be true!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always take what the &#8220;experts&#8221; say with a grain of salt.  Expert analysis lags real life &#8211; they wait for the numbers to &#8220;confirm&#8221; what the rest of the world &#8211; literally &#8211; already knew: we are in a bad recession.  You and I and everyone else on the street knew this at least 6 months ago.  The prices were going up, people were losing jobs, and belt tightening was necessary for nearly everyone.  But the &#8220;experts&#8221; refused to use the word recession.</p>
<p>But the flip side will also be true.  The recovery will be happening while &#8220;they&#8221; still think we are in a recession.  So is it a good time to buy a house?  If you can get a mortgage approved, yes!  Mortgage companies are looking for solid loans to boost their bottom lines, so SOME people are in higher demand for loans.  If you aren&#8217;t staying in a house for 5 to 7 years, you don&#8217;t need a house &#8211; that&#8217;s been a long-standing rule of thumb, nothing new.  If you lose your job or think you will &#8211; and you don&#8217;t already have a house &#8211; don&#8217;t buy one!  Again, not rocket science here.</p>
<p>Actually, most of this recession was caused by people accepting the &#8220;too good to be true&#8221; lines they were fed at face value.  I actually blogged about this back in September of 2007.  (<a href="http://12amusings.wordpress.com/2007/09/01/sub-prime-surprise/" rel="nofollow">http://12amusings.wordpress.com/2007/09/01/sub-prime-surprise/</a>)  What?  I can get a home with no money down and only a few hundred dollars a month (interest only loan)?  Wow!  Sounds too good to be true!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

