At a glance
- Workload: Light
- Teaching Style: Highly interactive
- Interest in students: Very high
- Relevance to outside world: Not sure.
Overall Professor Rating: 4
Overall Course Rating:3.5
Professor Tep is a completely different professor than anyone other you are likely to have at SCU. He believes not only in experiential learning but also in spirituality and looking at things with a much more holistic perspective. Can be off-putting to some. The course is also very loose, though it is also apparently ever-changing. Bo wants to introduce new ideas each quarter, it seems.
This is the latest of my reviews on the professors I’ve had while an MBA student at Santa Clara University‘s Leavey School of Business. There are lots of sites out there that provide feedback and rates – ratemyprofessor is the most notable. The SantaClaraMBA Yahoo group also has a big database of comments and lots of additional information in its message archive. That database can be a bit hard to wade through, and the comments are short and often just link to other threads, which are themselves pretty short and superficial. Only here can I write as much as I want 🙂
I review professors from a variety of perspectives. First, I explain the context(s) under which I took the class. Time of year, time of day, etc. Then I talk about the quality of the class and the professor, and finally about the professor as a person. After all, we are trying to learn about our interactions with people, so knowing that side of a teacher is critical, too. So these would be interactions outside the classroom, etc.
I’m also reviewing them in reverse order of when I had them for class. This is mostly so that I am reviewing those whom I remember the best sooner. This also means that at some point I might skip a few professors I took a year ago or just stop outright out of concern that I will not be able to provide a proper review (the downside of these longer reviews is that I do, after all, have a responsibility to do a good job at them). I am now back two quarters from my current term.
I had Professor Tep for Management 538 – Managing Groups and Teams – the Winter 2007. Professor Tep is very up front about the class, which is rather important considering his rather unconventional style of teaching. He sends out an e-mail a couple of weeks before the class stating that it’s an experiential course, rather than one about how to do project management. He reiterated this at the start of class, that we would be talking about our experiences in managing teams. Still, we lost about 40% of the class after the first few weeks.
I took 538 on Monday and Wednesday nights, at 5:30PM. I had this class immediately prior to another class with a losse structure, but not in a spiratual sense (see my review of Chacko’s Finance course ). I also took it in the same quarter as 512, taught by Cheryl Shavers, and the contrast was almost frightening.
A couple of things to note – Bo has changed the class a bit, giving it a bit more structure. I’m glad to say that some of this is from feedback that I and others provided to him. I really enjoyed the class but I think it needed a bit of tweaking so hopefully other students have enjoyed it. Also, Bo and I occasionally have coffee so we still stay in touch. That doesn’t make this any more of a subjective review, in reality, but just fyi.
Them’s the facts. Now read on for the review.